CAIS Accreditation Process

This Accreditation Process can be summarized in five key sections listed below.

Detailed information can be found in the Accreditation Guidelines.

Announcements

Post Title: Justo en Dolor Mollis, Purus, et Elit

This is the post summary. This post shows elements that can you can choose to display or omit within your own lists (ie - thumbnail, categories, author, date, etc).

Aenean Elit Porta Fringilla Sit et Ipsum Dolor Amet

Vestibulum id ligula porta felis euismod semper. Nulla vitae elit libero, a pharetra augue aenean lacinia bibendum ipsm dolor.

Fusce Lorem Justo Mattis

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nulla nec consequat velit. Pellentesque eget consequat elit, sit amet pellentesque dolor. Sed sed consequat nibh. Etiam mollis sem ac felis lobortis, sit amet aliquet massa pulvinar. Praesent condimentum porta metus at porta. Vestibulum felis dui, vulputate et ante sed, semper luctus quam.

Sample Post Title

Self Study

Over the course of 12 to 18 months, a school pursuing accreditation/reaccreditation will conduct a Self Study guided by the CAIS Accreditation Guidelines. These Guidelines contain Indicators of Effective Practice for each of the 12 National Standards.

The essence of this process is that the school, involving all of its constituents, examines all aspects of its school strategy, education program and school operations against the National Standards, seeking to discover its strengths, areas for growth, future strategy, and examining how well its program fulfils its mission.

If this process is done conscientiously and insightfully, the resulting document will clearly and accurately communicate the school’s current state and future goals to the Peer Review Team.

Peer Review

A Peer Review Team is assembled of school leaders and educators from similar CAIS schools who represent various areas of expertise and experience.

Working from the school’s Self Study, the Peer Review Team spends four days in the school meeting with the entire community including students, faculty and staff, parents, alumni and Board members. The Peer Review Team observes classes and all other activities of the school.

The Peer Review Team’s objective is to validate the school’s Self Study and further support the school to prioritize opportunities for growth.

Peer Review Report

Each member of the Peer Review Team is responsible for investigating various Indicators of Effective Practices within the school. Following the review, each Peer Review Team member contributes to a comprehensive Peer Review Report.

This report contains an overview of where the school stands in terms of each Indicator of Effective Practice and offers commendations (what the school is doing exceptionally well) and recommendations (areas of growth that require action by CAIS).

School Improvement Action Plan

Using the Standards rubrics and summaries within the School Self Study Report as well as the Peer Review report, the School’s Leadership Team will discuss and draft a School Improvement Action Plan. Components of the School Improvement Action Plan include:

Priorities that are self- and Peer Review-initiated areas for growth. These priorities reflect the Peer Review Report recommendations.

Actions are the specific tasks which lead to the realization of the priority.

Responsibility that includes the person(s) responsible for the specific task, including job title to ensure continuity of the School Improvement Action Plan if there is a staff change.

Resources should include:

Financial
Human
Professional Learning
Time/ Spatial

Timeline as it relates to priority level including month and year. Priority levels are included with each recommendation. The priority levels are Urgent Action, High Priority Action, Short-Term Action, and Long-Term Action.

Assessment Criteria that describe how the School will know they have accomplished their goal.

The School Improvement Action Plan should align with the School's own strategic priorities and include responses to recommendations from the Peer Review Report.

Accreditation Decisions

The Evaluation Council reviews the report Peer Review Report and advises the CAIS Board on its findings and a decision on accreditation.

The Peer Review Report is finalized once the CAIS Board approves a decision on accreditation. At this time, the school communicates the results of the review with their community. The School Improvement Action Plan is an opportunity for Schools to shape their work in Years Two to Five of the Accreditation Cycle. The School reports annually to CAIS indicating their progress on the School Improvement Action Plan.

Canadian
Accredited
Independent
Schools

Announcements

Navigation

CAIS Accreditation Process

Announcements

Self Study

Peer Review

Peer Review Report

School Improvement Action Plan

Accreditation Decisions